1. Detect
Identify drops in authorization rate, errors, latency, timeouts, webhook failures, stopped payouts or settlement outside expectations.
Redundancy only works if the team knows when to activate it, who decides and how to reconcile what happened afterward.
| Area | Signal |
|---|---|
| Authorization | Material drop versus the market/method baseline |
| Availability | Timeouts, errors or unavailable provider |
| Payouts | Stopped queue, abnormal rejects or undelivered funds |
| Settlement | Delay, unexpected amount or interrupted funds route |
| Reconciliation | Growing differences, inconsistent statuses or missing data |
Identify drops in authorization rate, errors, latency, timeouts, webhook failures, stopped payouts or settlement outside expectations.
Determine scope: provider, method, market, currency, cashier, acquiring, bank rail, wallet/network or internal dependency.
Avoid blind retries, duplicates or uncontrolled routing changes. Preserve IDs, timestamps, logs and evidence.
Activate an alternate route only if it is approved, tested and operationally available. Define who authorizes the change.
Align operations, payments, support, risk/compliance and the affected provider. Maintain one incident timeline.
Review pending transactions, payouts, balances, settlement and treasury exposure before and after the change.
Compare the internal source of truth with provider reports to identify pending items, duplicates, fees, refunds and differences.
Restore the original route only when cause and stability are sufficiently verified.
Document cause, impact, recovery time, decisions, gaps and preventive actions with an owner.
Confirm that the alternate route remains available for the applicable merchant, market and method. Ongoing provider approval, underwriting, compliance, limits and conditions can change; an existing integration does not guarantee permanent operational availability.
Start with a stack review or describe the case directly.