PaymentsNova Architecture Tool

Payment Stack Scorecard

Rate each area Strong, Partial or Gap. Prioritize gaps that affect continuity, acceptance, market access or movement of funds.

Payment stack self-assessment
AreaControl questionRating
CoverageDo priority markets and methods have operable coverage?Strong / Partial / Gap
RedundancyAre there real alternate routes for critical dependencies?Strong / Partial / Gap
RoutingAre routing rules defined, observable and changeable?Strong / Partial / Gap
SettlementAre settlement currency, frequency, dependencies and contingencies clear?Strong / Partial / Gap
ReconciliationCan transactions, fees, refunds, payouts and settlement be reconciled?Strong / Partial / Gap
RiskAre fraud, chargebacks, limits, compliance and provider approval integrated into the design?Strong / Partial / Gap
OperationsAre ownership, alerts, escalation and incident procedures defined?Strong / Partial / Gap

How to prioritize

Start with gaps that can stop collections or payouts, block a market, concentrate funds, or prevent reconciliation and operational recovery.

Payment Stack Audit →

Payment Architecture Checklist →

How to Choose a Payment Rail →

Evaluate providers against critical gaps →

Looking for a specific PSP, APM, settlement rail or partner?Send brief
Payment Stack Scorecard | PaymentsNova